I felt that this movie, like those "mockbusters", are deliberately tricking people into watching their movie.
Point one: Jackie Chan is in the title, on the cover, several pictures
on the backcover… so you would expect that the movie stars Jackie Chan.
WRONG. He makes a cameo and stars in one scene, the majority of the
film is about a kid in Indonesia who idolizes Jackie Chan and goes on a
journey to meet Chan in China.

The REAL Kung-Fu Master (note the similar artwork used for Jackie Chan Kung Fu Master)
Point two: Its title is deceiving, having released around the same time
that the much bigger budgeted Lionsgate's "Kung-Fu Master" starring Yuen
Biao. "Kung-Fu Master" was released in October, while "Jackie Chan
Kung Fu Master" in September. I believe the producers wanted you to
pick up the wrong movie.
Like the old saying goes, don't judge a book by its cover. The producers of
Jackie Chan Kung Fu Master
knows they can't sell the movie for its story, instead relies on
trickery to get people to watch their film. I suppose when it comes
down to it, the trick work and you can't fault them for such deceptive
practice, but it does leave a sour taste in your mouth.
I wouldn't actually recommend this film to any fan of martial arts (the
fight sequences are "staged" and "televised" with "blurry effects") and
there really isn't a compelling story.
I picked this up on Bluray for $8, at heavy discount, so I don't feel
that bad about it, but if you were to pay more than $10, you will be in
for massive disappointment.